Investigating the Judiciary Ethics of the Judges in the Seventh Century )Relying on Sa'adi's Bustan and Golestan and Rumi's Masnavi(

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD student of Department of Persian language and literature, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Isfahan, Iran

2 Department of Persian language and literature, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran

3 Professor of Persian Language and Literature Najaf Abad University

10.29252/kavosh.2020.1744

Abstract

udgment has always been one of the most important concerns of human societies and with regard to the outstanding role of the judges in every society, this subject has been widely reflected in Persian literature. While the manners of the judges have been lost in history books, the poets and men of letters have always tried to assert the existing fraudulent leak frankly or through symbols or allusions and this can double the importance of their literary works. The purpose of this paper is to examine the manners of judgment in the stories of the two literary men of Persian literature in the seventh century. On the one hand, the attitude and the kind of reaction of the poets and literary poets of that period against the distortion of the judiciary manners should be clarified. On the other hand, the ethical features and manners of the judges of justice should be considered with regard to their particular period. This study has been conducted through library research method and the result shows the tragic history since Mongol invasion of Iran caused a decline in the Judiciary system that made poets and men of letters call for justice to fight by a verbal weapon and the scandal would disgrace those judges in history. The results also showed that the manners of the judges from Sa'di and Molavi's views include high ethical and professional traits, such as justice and fairness, science and knowledge, asceticism and piety, virtue and vigilance, and religious and legal observance. The main difference lie in the fact that Sa’adi has focused more on the existing conditions and the reality of the judiciary status and the convicted sentences. Molavi, however, has concentrated more on individual and idealistic ethics.

Keywords

References

Holy Quran, Osman Taha line, translated by ,Mahdi Elahi Qomshai.
Imam Ali. (2017). Nahj al-Balagha, translated by Mohammad Dashti, sixteenth edition, Qom: Mohammad Amin.
Javadi Amoli, Abdollah. (2011). Courtesy in islam, second edition, Qom: Asraa.
Khavafi, Majd al-Din. (1966). Rozeye Khold, correction by Mahmoud Farrokh, first edition, Tehran: Zavvar.
Dehkhoda, Aliakbar. (1986). Dehkhoda Dictionary, Tehran: Dehkhoda Dictionary institute.
Deylami, Ahmad &Azarbaijani Masoud. (2004). Islamic ethics, 30 th edition, Qom: daftare nashr maaref.
Saadi, Mosleh ibn Abdullah. (2005). Boostan`e Saadi, correcting and explaining by Gholamhosein Yousefi, eighth edition, Tehran: Kharazmi.
------------------------------------. (2008). Golestan`e Saadi, correcting and explaining by Gholamhosein Yousefi, eighth edition, Tehran: Kharazmi.
Ghazali Toosi, Mohammad ibn Mohammad. (1973). Nasihat al-Molook, correction by Jalal al-din Homayi, first edition, Tehran: national works association.
Islamic Punishment Law 2013, first edition, Tehran: roozname rasmi.
Ghazali, Abu Hamed Mohammad. (1955). Makatib Farsi, look at Abbas Eghbal, first edition, Tehran: Majles.
Mottaghi, Ali ibn Hesam al-din. (1981). Kanz al-Amal fi Sonan al-Aghval v al-Afaal, fifth edition, lebanon: al-resalah.
Majlesi, Mohammad Bagher. (1989). Bahar al-Anvaar, 110 volumes, Beirut: al-Vafa institute.
Molavi, Jalal al-din Mohammad ibn Mohammad. (2005). Masnavi Manavi, correction by Ghavam al-din Khoramshahi, Tehran: Doostan.
Mahdavi Kani, Mohammad Reza. (2009). Starting points in practical ethics, twenty-fourth edition, Tehran: Islamic culture publication office.
Noori Tabrasi, Mirza Hosein. (1988). Mostadrak al-Vasael & Mostanbat al-Masael, volume 17, Qom: al al-beyt institute.
Articles:
Naseri Dolat Abadi, Mahdi & Saboori, Mostafa. (2017). Features a Good Judge, Principles of Judicial Ethics and Professional Conduct, Ghezavat quarterly, no. 91, pages 163 to 190.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics