Criticizing the Descriptions of Nezami’s Leily and Majnoon

Criticizing the Descriptions of Nezami’s Leily and Majnoon

Abstract
Today, content analysis is a widely used method to study literary works. It is a systematic, objective and quantitative analysis through which the characteristics of the language usage, text words and description of titles are examined through compatibility and correlation of words with each other and its findings cause to analyze the thematic content and to create the central words. Discourse analysis, among the different methods of content analysis, was selected to examine three descriptions of the existing descriptions of the poem "Nezami’s Leily and Majnoon" and critiqued to determine the correct and incorrect linguistic and semantic representations. For this purpose, the controversial verses have been studied in these three descriptions (Hassan Vahid Dastgerdi, Behrouz Thervatian, Barat Zanjani) that have been neglected in terms of correcting the version, prosody, the grammar and the correct meaning and concept, or the general meaning of a verse or a word that has been described in the wrong verse; some examples have been mentioned in this research. Among the other qualitative or interpretive methods, obtaining the criteria of the scientific method is the most distinguished feature of content analysis. In this research, in addition to referring to the practical examples, it has been tried to obtain the criteria of a scientific method in describing texts.
Keywords: Nezami Ganjavi, Leily and Majnoon, Criticizing the Descriptions, Content Analysis, Hassan Vahid Dastgerdi, Behrooz Thervatian, Barat Zanjani