The scientific nature of Literature as the intuitive embodiment and reflection of the human psych has not been thoroughly investigated so far. And literary theorists have studied it from aesthetic Point of view. Therefore, have turned a blind eye to epistemological and thought provoking approaches to the study of literature. Sometimes they have also reduced its value to physical enjoyment. Someothers have Limited themselves by explanation of moral aspects of literature as a source of espistomological as well as historie knowledge and science. Because of apparent nature of the From of Literary works, the study of the other aspect has been ignored. However, there is a close relationship between instinctive workings of between human Feeling and thought and the world which is established through literary imagination. The rhetorics of literary works expressed through symbol, metaphor, anecdote, Falacy, tale, etc. are all different Forms of Knowledge and thought in Literature.
The present article is an attempt to study the views of the signification literary theorists of the world and identify the scientific and thought Provoking components and Features of literature.
Novin, H. (2010). The Identity of Knowledge and Thought Provoking of Literature. Journal of Kavoshnameh in Persian Language and Literature, 11(20), 165-185. doi: 10.29252/kavosh.2010.2509
MLA
Novin, H. . "The Identity of Knowledge and Thought Provoking of Literature", Journal of Kavoshnameh in Persian Language and Literature, 11, 20, 2010, 165-185. doi: 10.29252/kavosh.2010.2509
HARVARD
Novin, H. (2010). 'The Identity of Knowledge and Thought Provoking of Literature', Journal of Kavoshnameh in Persian Language and Literature, 11(20), pp. 165-185. doi: 10.29252/kavosh.2010.2509
CHICAGO
H. Novin, "The Identity of Knowledge and Thought Provoking of Literature," Journal of Kavoshnameh in Persian Language and Literature, 11 20 (2010): 165-185, doi: 10.29252/kavosh.2010.2509
VANCOUVER
Novin, H. The Identity of Knowledge and Thought Provoking of Literature. Journal of Kavoshnameh in Persian Language and Literature, 2010; 11(20): 165-185. doi: 10.29252/kavosh.2010.2509