نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 عضو هیأت علمی گروه زبان و ادبیات فارسی دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه ولی عصر (عج) رفسنجان
2 عضو هیأت علمی گروه فلسفه و کلام اسلامی دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه ولی عصر (عج) رفسنجان
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Gholam Hossein Sharegh Yazdi (1847-1928) is a contemporary Iranian poet and since he was a teacher, judge, and lawyer, he had a good knowledge of logic. Through this, his philosophical-sophistic Masnavi is renowned for highlighting weak and invalid reasonings and arguments. He follows an elaborative approach to the different aspects of fallacy. Fallacy or errors in thought is a mixed comparison of similarities and illusions.
The present study uses a descriptive-analytical method to examine fallacies in Sharegh Yazidi’s Masnavi. The main question asked in this study is “what frameworks are presented by Sharegh Yazdi to avoid thought errors?” The Results showed that the poet elaborates on fallacy positions and also answers illusive objections of fake scholars by highlighting different types of thought errors and erroneous reasoning.
It is notable that the pathology of fallacy and baseless claims, which are mostly rooted in emotions and criticizing misleading ambiguous topics were the most mental damages mentioned by Sharegh. These have also enriched the educational aspects of his work. This means that the poet was aware of fallacy reasoning and highlighted them intentionally in his poems. In addition, the poet’s belief in and adherence to religion have filled his poems with reasonings rooted in religious beliefs.
کلیدواژهها [English]
الف) کتابها
3 _______________ (1365)، منطق اشارات و التنبیهات ابن سینا. ترجمة سیدابوالقاسم هاشمی، تهران: سیدابوالقاسم هاشمی.
6.پل، ریچارد و اِلدر، لیندا (1396)، مغالطههای پرکاربرد: 44 ترفند کثیف برای برندهشدن در بحثها، بازنویسی مهدی خسروانی. تهران: فرهنگ نشر نو با همکاری نشر آسیم.
8.خاضع، اردشیر (1341)، تذکره سخنوران یزد، حیدرآباد: کتابفروشی خاضع.
ب) مقالات